Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology ; 81(8 Supplement):3119, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2278415

ABSTRACT

Background Primary cardiac lymphoma (PCL) is an extranodal lymphoma involving only the heart and/or pericardium. PCL accounts for 2% of primary cardiac tumors and 0.5% of extranodal lymphomas. Its diagnosis is usually delayed due to rarity and non-specific findings. Case A 77-year-old man with Alzheimer dementia, atrial fibrillation on apixaban, and COVID-19 illness 3-weeks prior, who presented to the hospital with diffuse abdominal discomfort, fatigue, anorexia, and hypoactivity. Patient was tachycardic and normotensive with pronounced jugular venous distention, non-collapsing with respiration. ECG revealed sinus tachycardia, first degree atrioventricular (AV) block and chronic LBBB. Cardiac troponins were mildly elevated without significant delta. An abdominopelvic CT revealed an incidental, large pericardial effusion (PE). Bedside echocardiogram confirmed a large hemodynamically significant PE as well as a mass-like echogenicity encasing and infiltrating the pericardium and myocardium at the basal aspect of the right ventricle free wall. Decision-making In view of recent COVID-19 infection, he was started on indomethacin and colchicine for suspected viral or neoplastic pericarditis. Pericardiocentesis drained 900ml of amber to serosanguineous fluid with quick hemodynamic improvement. Fluid analysis was non-diagnostic for neoplasia. Subsequently, he developed symptomatic bradycardia with an intermittent complete AV block with junctional escape rhythm, transitioning to a second-degree AV block after removal of beta-blocker. Awaiting permanent pacemaker implant, he developed ventricular fibrillation with sudden cardiac death that required prolonged unsuccessful ACLS. Autopsy revealed an extensive infiltrative tumor, predominantly right-sided, consistent with primary cardiac B-cell lymphoma. Conclusion PCL should be part of the working diagnosis in patients presenting with a pericardial effusive process in combination with a right sided myocardial mass. Early cardiac MRI/PET scan or biopsy should be considered when the diagnosis is not certain. Prompt diagnosis could allow for treatment that potentially prolongs survival.Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation

2.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 55: e12003, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1951675

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the presence of SARS-CoV-2 on food surfaces and surfaces in public spaces in 3 districts of Lima, Peru. A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out in three districts of the Lima metropolitan area. Surfaces that were most exposed to users were selected. Samples were swabbed for 4 weeks and transported to the laboratory to determine the presence of the virus. One thousand ninety-five inert surface samples and 960 food surface samples were evaluated for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 by the real time-PCR molecular test, whereby only one sample from an automated teller machine was positive. Most of the inert and food surfaces evaluated did not show the presence of SARS-CoV-2 during the time of sample collection. Despite the negative results, the frequency of disinfection and hygiene measures on high-contact surfaces should be maintained and increased to prevent other highly contagious infectious diseases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Peru , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
3.
Cir Pediatr ; 35(3): 131-134, 2022 Jul 01.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1925075

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on healthcare has already been described, since it has caused an increase in diagnostic delay and morbidity. Our objective was to assess its influence on the development of complications in children with acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out. It included acute appendicitis patients under 15 years of age treated from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. They were classified according to diagnosis date as before the pandemic (B) (January 2019-February 2020) and during the pandemic (D) (March 2020-December 2020). According to operative findings, they were classified as complicated appendicitis (perforated/abscess/plastron/peritonitis) and non-complicated appendicitis (catarrhal/phlegmonous/gangrenous). Demographic data, progression time, and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients were included, 193 (62.5%) in Group B, and 116 (37.5%) in Group D, with an age of 9.2 ± 0.4 and 9.4 ± 0.6 years, respectively (CI = 95%). Diagnostic time was 1.35 and 1.43 days (p>0.05) in Groups B and D, respectively, with ≥ 3 days representing 15.5% of cases in Group B, and 16.4% of cases in Group D (p = 0.84). The proportion of complicated appendicitis was 23.3% in Group B vs. 21.6% in Group D (p>0.05). Postoperative complications were observed in 11.4% of patients in Group B, and in 13.8% of patients in Group D (p>0.05), with intra-abdominal abscess being the most frequent complication in both groups (54.5% of the total complications in Group B vs. 65.5% in Group D; p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The management of acute appendicitis and its complications in pediatric patients has not been impacted by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic or the safety measures enforced.


INTRODUCCION: Se ha descrito el impacto de la pandemia del SARS-CoV-2 en la atención sanitaria, al suponer un aumento del retraso diagnóstico y morbilidad. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar su influencia en el desarrollo de complicaciones en las apendicitis agudas en niños. METODOLOGIA: Estudio retrospectivo de cohortes, incluyendo los pacientes menores de 15 años tratados por apendicitis aguda desde 01/01/2019 hasta 31/12/2020. Se distribuyeron según su fecha de diagnóstico en: antes de la pandemia (A) (enero/2019-febrero/2020) y durante la pandemia (P) (marzo-diciembre/2020). Según los hallazgos quirúrgicos se clasificaron en: apendicitis complicadas (perforadas/abscesos/plastrones/peritonitis) y no complicadas (catarrales/flemonosas/gangrenosas). Se analizaron datos demográficos, tiempo de evolución y complicaciones postoperatorias. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 309 pacientes, 193 pacientes (62,5%) en el grupo A y 116 (37,5%) en el P, con edades de 9,2 ± 0,4 y 9,4 ± 0,6 años respectivamente (IC = 95%). Los días al diagnóstico fueron 1,35 y 1,43 (p>0,05) en A y P respectivamente, siendo ≥ 3 días en 15,5% de A y 16,4% en P (p = 0,84). La proporción de apendicitis complicada fue un 23,3% en A vs. 21,6% en P; con p>0,05. Se observaron complicaciones postoperatorias en 11,4% de A y 13,8% de P (p>0,05), siendo la más frecuente el absceso intraabdominal en ambos grupos (54,5% del total de complicaciones vs 65,5%; en A y P respectivamente; p>0,05). CONCLUSIONES: La atención sanitaria de la apendicitis aguda y sus complicaciones en pacientes pediátricos no se ha visto modificada por la pandemia del SARS-CoV-2 o las medidas de seguridad adoptadas durante la misma.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , COVID-19 , Laparoscopy , Acute Disease , Appendectomy , Appendicitis/complications , Appendicitis/epidemiology , Appendicitis/surgery , COVID-19/complications , Child , Delayed Diagnosis , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Cir Pediatr ; 35(1): 10-13, 2022 Jan 01.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1627174

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic brought about a reduction in surgical activity. The objective of this work was to analyze its impact on inguinal hernia morbidity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of cases and controls was carried out. Patients under 18 months of age undergoing inguinal hernia surgery from January 1, 2019 to August 31, 2020 were included. They were divided into two groups: patients undergoing surgery before (group A) or after (group D) the state of alarm was declared in Spain. Primary variables: episodes of incarceration and postoperative complications. Secondary variable: urgent or scheduled surgery. Demographic variables: sex, gestational age (GA), previous pathologies, age at diagnosis (AD), and age at surgery (AS) (months). RESULTS: 64 patients were included - 43 in group A and 21 in group D. In group A, median GA was 37+3, 90.5% of patients were male, median AD was 2.33, and median AS was 3.27. In group D, median GA was 31+2, 72.1% of patients were male, median AD was 3, and median AS was 3.63. There were no statistically significant differences. However, differences in terms of previous pathologies were significant (16.3% for Group A vs. 38.1% for group D) (p = 0.05). Regarding the primary variable, 25.6% of patients in group A had incarcerations vs. 33.3% of patients in group D (p = 0.51), whereas 9.3% of patients in group A had postoperative morbidity vs. 14.3% of patients in group D (p = 0.41). Regarding the secondary variable, 88.4% of surgeries in group A were scheduled vs. 90.5% of surgeries in group D (p = 0.583). CONCLUSION: In spite of reduced surgical activity, inguinal hernia morbidity did not surge in our environment. An increase in patients with previous pathologies was noted, which means severe patients should be prioritized.


INTRODUCCION: La pandemia del SARS-CoV-2 supuso una reducción de las jornadas quirúrgicas. Analizamos el efecto en la morbilidad de la hernia inguinal. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles. Incluimos menores de 18 meses intervenidos de hernia inguinal desde 01/01/2019 hasta 31/08/2020, divididos en 2 grupos: intervenidos antes (grupo A) o después (grupo D) de la declaración del estado de alarma. Variables principales: episodios de incarceraciones y complicaciones postoperatorias. Variable secundaria: intervención urgente o programada. Variables poblacionales: sexo, edad gestacional (EG), patología previa, edad al diagnóstico(ED) y a la intervención (EI) (meses). RESULTADOS: Incluimos 64 pacientes, 43 grupo A y 21 grupo D. En el grupo A la mediana de EG fue 37+3, el 90,5% fueron varones, la mediana ED fue 2,33 y EI 3,27. En el grupo B la mediana de EG fue 31+2, el 72,1% fueron varones, la mediana ED fue 3 y EI 3,63. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas. Si fueron significativas las diferencias en patología previa 16,3% A y 38,1% D (p = 0,05). Sobre la variable principal: 25,6% del A sufrieron incarceraciones frente a 33,3% del D (p = 0,51) y un 9,3% tuvieron morbilidad postoperatoria en A frente a 14,3% en D (p = 0,41). Respecto a la variable secundaria un 88,4% se realizaron de forma programada en el grupo A y un 90,5% en el grupo D (p = 0,583). CONCLUSION: Pese a la reducción de jornadas quirúrgicas no ha aumentado la morbilidad de la hernia inguinal en nuestro medio. Hemos observado un aumento de pacientes con patología previa, implicando la priorización de los pacientes más graves.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hernia, Inguinal , Hernia, Inguinal/epidemiology , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy , Humans , Infant , Male , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
5.
16th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE 2021 ; : 379-386, 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1597501

ABSTRACT

In early 2020, COVID-19 crossed international borders and became a pandemic severely affecting public health worldwide. Health services were stretched thin. The confinement also triggered other social, economic, and cultural problems. Unemployment increased, family dynamics changed, and educational institutions faced the challenge of continuing academic operations. Governments implemented mechanisms to address the situation, but their efforts have been insufficient. Private companies, foundations, civic organizations, universities, and citizens in general, began to respond with creative problem-solving projects. Moreover, universities implemented social innovation projects to deal with pandemic challenges. In this study, we reviewed the websites of 20 universities selected from a pool of internationally ranked institutions to analyze such projects. Of these, seven universities were in North America, Europe and Asia;seven in Latin America, and six in Mexico. The analysis was qualitative and inductive. There was information related to COVID 19 in all the websites reviewed, such as sanitation measures, recommendations, news, and the university's guidelines. They also featured information about the social innovation projects organized by these universities. The identified projects were categorized into four areas: a) scientific research, including projects related to vaccine development and treatments;b) education, enclosing digital systems for academic continuity and educational programs for society;c) technology, used in team development projects and strategies, and d) innovation, with holistic proposals for emotional, physical, and psychological care and well-being. Several projects leveraged technological tools to resolve the various complexities of health confinements, resulting in digital social innovations. It was observed that the pandemic accelerated the social-digital innovations, thereby blurring the limits between the technological and the social. Such a tendency presents an opportunity for universities to generate more projects and escalate those already in existence. Therefore, reviewing the status of these projects may ensure their continuity or adaptation to the new normal of pandemic and post-pandemic times. © 2021, Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited. All rights reserved.

6.
in vitro study |letter |nonhuman |SARS-CoV-2 Omicron |Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; 2022(Anales de la Facultad de Medicina)
Article in Spanish | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-1979748
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL